3 ms·
Fair point. Kind of makes the comparisons between languages a little unfair, though. Go and Rust would be executing these operations in parallel, Node would not
by afavour 2y ago
Fair point. Kind of makes the comparisons between languages a little unfair, though. Go and Rust would be executing these operations in parallel, Node would not. Would make a significant difference to real world performance!
- Izkata 2y agoThe measurement is memory, not performance. Paused/queued tasks in the sequential node version still count, and in theory could be worse since the Go and Rust ones would be consuming them in parallel and not building up the queue as much.
- lenkite 2y ago> The measurement is memory, not performance. But, then they can measure memory by simply using a threat pool of size 1 and then submitting tasks to it right ? That would be the equivalent comparison for other languages. They should launch a million NodeJS processes.