2 ms·
Do you have a source more recent than https://archive.is/3weox https://archive.is/3weox (WSJ article)? It appears to be a Chinese ship, although it is not clea
by BryantD 2y ago
Do you have a source more recent than https://archive.is/3weox https://archive.is/3weox (WSJ article)?
It appears to be a Chinese ship, although it is not clear that the Chinese government sanctioned whatever happened.
- sunaookami 2y agoIf you read the article it even states that it's a Chinese ship but with a Russian crew that departed from Russia. They leased it from China. If you have an accident with a leased Chinese car, no one would say "the Chinese did it".
- meiraleal 2y agodamn Russians framing Chinese is a good proof their partnership isn't going well (same with Americans exploding germany infrastructure [nordstream])
- fennecfoxy 2y agoThe difference is that your point is just conjecture. Afaik nobody knows exactly who was responsible for the pipe. But we do not whose ship it was and who was on the crew at the time.
- imp0cat 2y agoTrue. But the way you phrased it, it sounds like now the Russians had "an accident" in a Chinese ship and unfortunately some cables got cut as a result. Oh those poor clumsy Russian, surely they never meant any harm. /s Anyways, I think the original "pretty dark view" can easily be extended to cover both these nations and it wouldn't be far from the truth (which, as you may correctly add, is the US-centric kind of truth - the best kind of truth as far as personal freedoms are concerned).
- BryantD 2y agoNo, it does not. It says "The crew of Yi Peng 3, which is captained by a Chinese national and includes a Russian sailor..." That is not at all "a Russian crew."