> the New Yorker has better writers. Really? I suppose it's very subjective, but I find their style, both in this article and in general to be unbearably long

> the New Yorker has better writers. Really? I suppose it's very subjective, but I find their style, both in this article and in general to be unbearably long - almost as if their journalists enjoy writing for the sake of writing, with the transmission of information being a minor concern.