3 ms·
Yes! The actual commands that you have to search up to get it to run automatically without user input, take almost as long to put together as finding the bug th
by crdrost 2y ago
Yes! The actual commands that you have to search up to get it to run automatically without user input, take almost as long to put together as finding the bug that you're finding (in the 80% case, of course there are 20% cases that take forever) but there is something so satisfying about seeing the thing just humming along once you have it set, that just makes it so satisfying.
- dataflow 2y ago> Yes! The actual commands that you have to search up to get it to run automatically without user input, take almost as long to put together as finding the bug that you're finding Funny, I just wrote the exact same thing only to scroll down and see you had the same opinion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42262579 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42262579
- crdrost 2y agoOne nice thing is that, once it's in your shell history, doing it again is really easy. So on a big codebase I was working on, it really did help multiple times and saved more than the initial investment. The frustrating thing is, because it's in your shell history, you have to look it up again after you change jobs...