3 ms·
Yes, obviously. Cheating is subverting the testers intent and being dishonest about it. Not just what a lawyer can weasel word their way around.
by finnthehuman 2y ago
Yes, obviously. Cheating is subverting the testers intent and being dishonest about it. Not just what a lawyer can weasel word their way around.
- gopher_space 2y agoIt’s not dishonest, it’s just business. I’m under the exact same burden of truth as the company interviewing me; zilch.
- theamk 2y agoFair enough! In this case, it seems that policy "hard-fail any candidates who use cheat, using AI or otherwise" is working as expected. Interviews are supposed to be candidate's best showing. If that includes cheating, better fail them fast.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]