> Older computers usually guzzle power, especially if you look at the absolutely awful Pentium4 systems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_

> Older computers usually guzzle power, especially if you look at the absolutely awful Pentium4 systems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_processors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_proces... The Northwood chips were 50 to 70 W. HT chips and later Prescott chips were more 80 to 90 W. Even the highest chips I see on the page are only 115 W. But modern chips can use way more power than Pentium 4 chips: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_Lake https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_Lake The i5-14600K has a base TDP of 125 W and turbo TDP of 181 W, and the high-end i9-14900KS is 150 W base/253 W turbo. For example, when encoding video, the mid-range 14600K pulls 146 W: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i9-14900k-cpu-review#section-power-consumption-on-intel-core-i9-14900k-i7-14700k-and-i5-14600k https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i9-14900k-cpu-r... More recent processors can do more with the same power than older processors, but I think for the most part that doesn't matter. Most people don't keep their processor at 100% usage a lot anyway.