This blog post copies the same old arguments that others have made about "AI" being bad. It also includes direct quotes from other sources right inside of the t

This blog post copies the same old arguments that others have made about "AI" being bad. It also includes direct quotes from other sources right inside of the text. Therefore, this article is not original and the author is a theif! There is no mention of derivative work (let alone any mention about what makes something "original" anyways). It is almost as if the author of the post is trying to cover his own tracks