4 ms·
I have no doubt that VSCode has a much less risk of executing code by opening something. Ironically however, it seems that VSCode's extension is the most effect
by uludag 2y ago
I have no doubt that VSCode has a much less risk of executing code by opening something. Ironically however, it seems that VSCode's extension is the most effective channel to distribute malware in the history of code editors. [1] [2]
Not that MELPA couldn't be used to distribute malware either, I just think, as another poster mentioned, these problems are almost more social than technical.
[1] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malicious-vscode-extensions-with-millions-of-installs-discovered/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malicious-vsc...
[2] https://arxiv.org/html/2411.07479v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2411.07479v1
- alwayslikethis 2y agoIf anything, Emacs users are probably much more likely to inspect the code of whatever extension they are using, since with every help page there is a link to the source code. It helps that it's much less popular and so not as big of a target.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]