4 ms·
Worked for a major ecommerce company that did this too - It was extremely unpleasant to work under (yet profitable if you won) and I don't like the practice but
by JohnMakin 2y ago
Worked for a major ecommerce company that did this too - It was extremely unpleasant to work under (yet profitable if you won) and I don't like the practice but it was pretty effective. I'd guess that YC would take the "sea turtle" reproduction pattern here of hatching a bunch of mostly similar turtles and hoping a couple of them make it to sea. Stinks for the small guys that don't make it though.
- sneak 2y agoTruly curious, why does it "stink" for the loser? Being funded with pay to pursue a failing business venture with a chance at wild financial success seems like a pretty good gig.
- JohnMakin 2y agoFrom the perspective of people with capital, it doesn't. From the perspective of a loser it sucks because they may or may not have invested significant emotional, financial, and otherwise non-fungible capital into a future that relied on the success of this venture (and also the people they employed), and I can tell you from personal experience being an underling when this kind of venture collapses really sucks. Maybe not for founders, but for everyone else it definitely does.
- pas 2y ago... but still, they have just about as much chance as the other guys, no? Competition is a given usually anyway. Maybe even in the same batch having very similar companies makes sense -- see the recent rush of YC funded companies that build on whatever OpenAI released -- because different founders/teams can be introduced to different contacts in the YC network.
- dangus 2y agoYou can do the same thing by working a temporary contractor role and playing the local lottery.
- rolandog 2y agoI can hypothesize that it may give startups the incentive to behave in reckless ways (e.g. pursue the MVP instead of the MVSP); think of the modern distortion of "ask for forgiveness, not permission" [0]: > So “Ask forgiveness, not permission” meant: Do the right thing within the organization, whether or not they know it. That way you can help the people that you work for. > It did NOT mean: Move the extrinsic cost to the public domain so that we can profit. [0]: https://changelog.com/posts/what-admiral-grace-hopper-really-meant https://changelog.com/posts/what-admiral-grace-hopper-really...