2 ms·
Haskell has do-notation which is a more general kind of this syntactic sugar
by greener_grass 2y ago
Haskell has do-notation which is a more general kind of this syntactic sugar
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- kccqzy 2y agoYeah that's what I said about bind. Let's consider a language like C++ where it has none of those syntax sugars. The absl::StatusOr is a class with the idea that errors should be values. The standard library has std::expected since C++23. So where is your pyramid of doom?