2 ms·

The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle is a startling book with a rather disturbing wartime scene that has haunted me for years. Currently I'd recommend Yakumo Koizumi and

by n1b0m 2y ago

The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle is a startling book with a rather disturbing wartime scene that has haunted me for years. Currently I'd recommend Yakumo Koizumi and Natsume Soseki for more old school Japanese writings. Mishima's The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea is another great read, despite the author being an extremely disagreeable person.

criddell 2y ago
I've read a few of Murakami's books (including Wind Up Bird) and enjoyed them. They certainly have their flaws and if you ever browse through a thread in a books subreddit, they will be pointed out with glee by one person after another. The primary complaint seems to be how he writes women. You'd think a books subreddit would be a place for people to celebrate books and writers but it mostly seems to be a place for people who dislike particular books in particular ways to vent and rant. They don't like book X and they don't want you to either. Thanks for the recommendations. I'm going to check them all out.
- PrismCrystal 2y ago
  The primary complaint I have seen about Murakami in internet books forums, is how repetitive his writing ultimately became. His treatment of women that strikes many as problematic, is just one of the things that get repeated.
A_D_E_P_T 2y ago
Mishima's Sea of Fertility tetralogy was excellent. The second entry in the series, Runaway Horses, is in my opinion the 20th century's best novel. The fourth, with its surprising conclusion, was also astounding. Much to my surprise, I've found that the books actually read better in English translation than they do in Japanese. Mishima was inordinately fond of using complicated, and sometimes archaic, Chinese-style (kanji) characters that even native Japanese readers have trouble with. His books flow a little bit more smoothly in English, and they don't seem to lose much in translation.
- PrismCrystal 2y ago
  It has been years since I read the Sea of Fertility, but I remember one Western scholar of Japan claiming that the fourth volume was a shoddy work compared to the previous three, written hastily as Mishima was preparing for his death. Since the English version didn’t obviously strike me as so flawed, I wondered if the translator had done some rescue work. Sadly, I’ll probably never be able to read the book in its original Japanese.
  - A_D_E_P_T 2y ago
    I saw nothing wrong with the fourth book -- and I preferred it to the first, which was perhaps a little bit too saccharine and tinged with nostalgia for a lost world, and the third, which was a little bit too sedate. (Especially after the wild vitality of the second.) Public opinion turned on Mishima after his death. Westerners, by and large, took offense at his final actions. The Japanese found it embarrassing and endeavored to forget all about it. I'd venture a guess that your critic could be influenced by feelings that have nothing to do with the book as a thing in itself.

by n1b0m 2y ago

criddell 2y ago

I've read a few of Murakami's books (including Wind Up Bird) and enjoyed them. They certainly have their flaws and if you ever browse through a thread in a books subreddit, they will be pointed out with glee by one person after another. The primary complaint seems to be how he writes women. You'd think a books subreddit would be a place for people to celebrate books and writers but it mostly seems to be a place for people who dislike particular books in particular ways to vent and rant. They don't like book X and they don't want you to either. Thanks for the recommendations. I'm going to check them all out.

PrismCrystal 2y ago
The primary complaint I have seen about Murakami in internet books forums, is how repetitive his writing ultimately became. His treatment of women that strikes many as problematic, is just one of the things that get repeated.

A_D_E_P_T 2y ago

Mishima's Sea of Fertility tetralogy was excellent. The second entry in the series, Runaway Horses, is in my opinion the 20th century's best novel. The fourth, with its surprising conclusion, was also astounding. Much to my surprise, I've found that the books actually read better in English translation than they do in Japanese. Mishima was inordinately fond of using complicated, and sometimes archaic, Chinese-style (kanji) characters that even native Japanese readers have trouble with. His books flow a little bit more smoothly in English, and they don't seem to lose much in translation.

PrismCrystal 2y ago
It has been years since I read the Sea of Fertility, but I remember one Western scholar of Japan claiming that the fourth volume was a shoddy work compared to the previous three, written hastily as Mishima was preparing for his death. Since the English version didn’t obviously strike me as so flawed, I wondered if the translator had done some rescue work. Sadly, I’ll probably never be able to read the book in its original Japanese.
- A_D_E_P_T 2y ago
  I saw nothing wrong with the fourth book -- and I preferred it to the first, which was perhaps a little bit too saccharine and tinged with nostalgia for a lost world, and the third, which was a little bit too sedate. (Especially after the wild vitality of the second.) Public opinion turned on Mishima after his death. Westerners, by and large, took offense at his final actions. The Japanese found it embarrassing and endeavored to forget all about it. I'd venture a guess that your critic could be influenced by feelings that have nothing to do with the book as a thing in itself.