4 ms·
If that's indeed it, I would rank the article as worse than 91 percent of ordinary boring Elon and Tesla bashing in 2024. I guess on a positive note they stopp
by bboygravity 2y ago
If that's indeed it, I would rank the article as worse than 91 percent of ordinary boring Elon and Tesla bashing in 2024.
I guess on a positive note they stopped posting that Tesla is almost bankrupt for the 1000th time because Elon.
- xcv123 2y ago[flagged]
- throwaway8754aw 2y agoElon is out for Elon always ..a slimey used car salesman I.e. bring out the AI Optimus robots all controlled by AI. Not! Elon is Trump's next Omarosa...
- clarionbell 2y agoElon continues to baffle by avoiding bankruptcy.
- mst 2y agoIt isn't, this time. I've seen plenty of articles, contemptuous tweets, etc. that conflated OTA updates that were classified as 'recalls' by the safety authorities with physical issue recalls. And I'm annoyed that the article didn't provide the answer itself. But per https://www.cars.com/research/tesla-cybertruck/recalls/ https://www.cars.com/research/tesla-cybertruck/recalls/ 5/6 of the recalls for the cybertruck to date have been physical, only the immediately previous one was resolveable by an OTA update. (I'm in the "I think Elon is a dick but Tesla is pretty cool and SpaceX is awesome" camp personally, so bad criticism of Tesla annoys me not just on a basis of hating bad criticism of things in general but also because I get doubly annoyed when somebody criticises somebody I believe *is* worth of criticism and then manages to do it inaccurately ... you're in a target rich environment! Stop shooting at squirrels instead!)