4 ms·
Although, the sources in this case are basically articles citing things he said on Twitter.
by auntienomen 2y ago
Although, the sources in this case are basically articles citing things he said on Twitter.
- yakshaving_jgt 2y agoDoes that make them invalid? Surely we’re not expecting to see Dotcom’s dangerous misinformation published in a peer reviewed scientific journal?
- mingus88 2y agoI believe OPs point was that there is very little ambiguity when the source is his very own words posted by him directly
- indigo0086 2y agoAre his words untrue or just disliked?
- yakshaving_jgt 2y agoDotcom's? Dotcom's words are untrue, yes.