At the same time, taking a natural resource[land] and reserving it for exclusive whether it be private or public ownership is also not a right. It's a consequen

At the same time, taking a natural resource[land] and reserving it for exclusive whether it be private or public ownership is also not a right. It's a consequence of the myth of necessary order - that the garden is preferable to the wild, that boundaries and order are necessary to function, but like this, the comprehensive ownership of land is in fact the cause of this very issue. If there was a wild or commons, this problem would cease to exist.