2 ms·
Speaking of controlling communications-- this entire thread, which was #2 on HN when I first saw it-- has been buried because it is not sufficiently pro-obama.
by nirvana 14y ago
Speaking of controlling communications-- this entire thread, which was #2 on HN when I first saw it-- has been buried because it is not sufficiently pro-obama.
Meanwhile the latest uneducated screed about how the banks caused the housing crisis (false) and are EVIL!, will always stay way up on the first page of HN for hours if not a day or so.
I can't stand this censorship on HN. Well, it wouldn't bother me if the HN core audience weren't constantly saying "We're objective and open minded!"
- CWuestefeld 14y agoDownvote: 1) You can't possibly make a factual statement like it "has been buried because it is not sufficiently pro-obama". You can't know other people's reasons for not up-voting. 2) HN is a private service that can feature whatever content it likes. If they choose not to link to something, that's not censorship -- censorship is something a government does to you. 3) You can't call someone's decision not to up-vote an article "censorship" in any case.