That chapter in superfreakonomics is terrible. I only have a superficial knowledge of common claims and counter-claims in climate science, but I put down the bo

That chapter in superfreakonomics is terrible. I only have a superficial knowledge of common claims and counter-claims in climate science, but I put down the book in disgust halfway through that chapter. Read more at [The Economist](http://www.economist.com/node/14738383 http://www.economist.com/node/14738383) or Eric Pooley for [Bloomberg](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2009-10-19/freakonomics-guys-flunk-science-of-climate-change-eric-pooley.html http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2009-10-19/freakonomics-guys-f...). If you do a google-search, you'll probably find point-for-point rebuttals at the normal climate science blogs, too.