10 ms·
"it is a central plank of climate policy worldwide that the current temperatures are the highest ever seen for many millennia, and that this results from rising
by JacobAldridge 14y ago
"it is a central plank of climate policy worldwide that the current temperatures are the highest ever seen for many millennia, and that this results from rising levels of atmospheric CO2 emitted by human activities"
No, it's not. It's known (see edit) that the earth was warmer about 1,000 years ago - it was part of why I resisted climate science for so long (the Roman part is new to me, though of course no Romans were growing trees in Scandinavia).
That it was hotter then does not mean recent warming is natural - it just means needing other evidence for claims of human contribution. Which I believe exists.
Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period
- graeme 14y agoErr...even if temperatures were higher in the past, that doesn't affect whether humans are contributing to recent warming (i.e. whether it is natural). Everyone agrees that humans are warming the climate. It's referred to as a "forcing" in the quoted study. The disagreement is on how much of an impact we're having. edit: sorry, just noticed the study didn't mention human forcings. But, if you read most skeptic scientists, they're just disagreeing about impact. You can replicate CO2's warming effect in a lab.