4 ms·
>There are virtually no unconnected places in most of Europe yet wilderness is still dangerous. eg. 50.30819551805026, 16.50959758078629
by 71bw 2y ago
>There are virtually no unconnected places in most of Europe yet wilderness is still dangerous.
eg. 50.30819551805026, 16.50959758078629
- rafram 2y agoWhy that example? It doesn't look very remote to me.
- 71bw 2y agoSorry, forgot to add the crucial details. Such is the life while close to quitting work for the day. The location, despite not being remote, has NO connectivity. It's the closest thing I can think of in my proximity that is completely unconnected. You're lucky to get GPRS there in terms of data, and most likely you won't even be able to place a call.[1] There is no broadband/fibre or any other sort of physical network connected to the buildings in the area.[2] The only way of connecting the place aside from Starlink that I've found is other satellite options[3], and it's most likely going to be 6 times as expensive and 50 times slower. [1] Anegdotal evidence, based on many devices on two of Poland's most prominent carriers when it comes to infrastructure - Orange/T-Mobile (shared NetWorkS! project) and Plus [2] https://internet.gov.pl/map/?center=1839972.2603685544%3B6498952.727787701&zoom=18.019687673721986 https://internet.gov.pl/map/?center=1839972.2603685544%3B649... [3] https://www.dostawcy-internetu.pl/Dwukierunkowy-Internet-Satelitarny/Dolnoslaskie,klodzki,Mloty.html https://www.dostawcy-internetu.pl/Dwukierunkowy-Internet-Sat...