> Well, I strongly disagree to the arbitary dividing of the world in good and evil. That's not what I said though. It's dividing chunks of time within an indiv

> Well, I strongly disagree to the arbitary dividing of the world in good and evil. That's not what I said though. It's dividing chunks of time within an individual. There is no purely good or evil person. Humans contain the capacity for both, and how it manifests is mostly a function of their environment at any point in time combined with the historical context that got them to that point. Look up dialectical/historical materialism to understand how this comes to be. > Still a surprise, that you see china as a positive force here. I cited it not as a "pure good" like you're attempting to coerce from my words. Instead I cited it as an example of a group of people with a Marxist background doing some things better than capitalism (and some things worse).