Extensively discussed over the last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42177767 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42177767 https://news.ycombinator

Extensively discussed over the last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42177767 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42177767 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42201261 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42201261 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42190456 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42190456 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42206590 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42206590 The entire framing of this post is wrong anyway (unsurprising, since it's just content marketing slop). This isn't something that the DOJ just decides on. They're the plaintiffs, not the judge or jury. Instead it's the remedy the DOJ asked for from the courts.