> it's not clear if that was the author's actual intention The paper[1] doesn't appear to have any other connections to the book/response/memes. A clear distin

> it's not clear if that was the author's actual intention The paper[1] doesn't appear to have any other connections to the book/response/memes. A clear distinction is that the UB paper very directly and prominently states the question, rather than cloaking it in allusion or having a lengthy preface trying to contextualize it. [1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3403r0.pdf https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p34...