3 ms·
You are paying a premium for scaling, bandwidth, operations and lower capital cost. Being able to smoothly scale from 1TB to 2TB (or down to 500GB) is nothing
by aristus 18y ago
You are paying a premium for scaling, bandwidth, operations and lower capital cost.
Being able to smoothly scale from 1TB to 2TB (or down to 500GB) is nothing to sneeze at. Nor is having a metered 250mbps connection (shop around -- hard to get less than $30/mbps at low volume), or having someone else handle the pager 24x7x365, or paying $150 at the end of the month instead of $5,000 up front.
There are systems and scales for which S3 is actually too expensive, and of course Amazon is making a profit off of all of this.
But there are a lot of hidden costs to DIY. Ask anyone who's tried to get 6 more servers flown in on the weekend, or had to cut short a holiday to drive to the damned colo at 3am, or overbought capacity, etc.
(edit) As for the "unlimited" option -- SM et al know to the byte what their average user uses so they price the unlimited option to make a profit on the average case.