It's noting how once your argument has been invalidated, you raise a new argument incompatible with the previous one. Well I don't see it that way, and it seem

It's noting how once your argument has been invalidated, you raise a new argument incompatible with the previous one. Well I don't see it that way, and it seems you're reading a dynamic into the situation that just isn't there. But we agree in any case that the discussion has been dead for several iterations now.