3 ms·
data to support this claim? you are (incorrectly) assuming that since employees are not commuting to work they are just home and cars are just collecting dust i
by bdangubic 2y ago
data to support this claim? you are (incorrectly) assuming that since employees are not commuting to work
they are just home and cars are just collecting dust in a garage… but of course you go to the store and mall and park and … in the middle of the day and you see a whole other story :)
- jumping_frog 2y agoOne off excursions are totally different than a 5 day back and forth. I don't have data but one can guess.
- brantonb 2y agoI have data for myself. My annual driving dropped from roughly 9,000 miles to 5,000 miles when I switched to WFH. In addition to avoiding the daily back and forth, I’d often make a detour on my evening commute to get groceries for the next couple of days. Now I plan things out better and make fewer shopping trips, as well. I wonder if I could negotiate cheaper car insurance rates. I’m driving far less and on safer streets, rarely getting on a major highway.
- bdangubic 2y agoyou don’t write policies based on guesses…
- bdangubic 2y agothere are many positives of WFH but climate change is not one of them
- insane_dreamer 2y agoWe have data from COVID when most people were working from home.
- bdangubic 2y agoCOVID is an outlier mate… it wasn’t just that most people were working from home, it was that everything stopped. if that was sustainable long-term that we are all on lockdown globally sure - we’d get traction in climate change and fast. unfortunately though…
- insane_dreamer 2y agoYeah, during the initial lockdown period everything stopped but afterwards things resumed a bit more normally as businesses opened, etc., while a large number of people were still working from home.