6 ms·
I don't understand why isn't WFH made mandatory since it helps with climate change.
by jumping_frog 2y ago
I don't understand why isn't WFH made mandatory since it helps with climate change.
- Muromec 2y agoBecause mandate giving authority doesn’t care about climate change. That’s pretty obvious explanation
- bdangubic 2y agodata to support this claim? you are (incorrectly) assuming that since employees are not commuting to work they are just home and cars are just collecting dust in a garage… but of course you go to the store and mall and park and … in the middle of the day and you see a whole other story :)
- jumping_frog 2y agoOne off excursions are totally different than a 5 day back and forth. I don't have data but one can guess.
- brantonb 2y agoI have data for myself. My annual driving dropped from roughly 9,000 miles to 5,000 miles when I switched to WFH. In addition to avoiding the daily back and forth, I’d often make a detour on my evening commute to get groceries for the next couple of days. Now I plan things out better and make fewer shopping trips, as well. I wonder if I could negotiate cheaper car insurance rates. I’m driving far less and on safer streets, rarely getting on a major highway.
- bdangubic 2y agoyou don’t write policies based on guesses…
- bdangubic 2y agothere are many positives of WFH but climate change is not one of them
- insane_dreamer 2y agoWe have data from COVID when most people were working from home.
- bdangubic 2y agoCOVID is an outlier mate… it wasn’t just that most people were working from home, it was that everything stopped. if that was sustainable long-term that we are all on lockdown globally sure - we’d get traction in climate change and fast. unfortunately though…
- insane_dreamer 2y agoYeah, during the initial lockdown period everything stopped but afterwards things resumed a bit more normally as businesses opened, etc., while a large number of people were still working from home.