3 ms·
See how you're just escalating the discussion? Your claim was that Russia is losing because the territorial conquest progress is "slow". Now you're claiming th
by ossobuco 2y ago
See how you're just escalating the discussion? Your claim was that Russia is losing because the territorial conquest progress is "slow".
Now you're claiming that Russia is losing because they will exhaust their resources before Ukraine. Even this argument is weak, as proven by Ukraine's invasion of Kursk.
- aguaviva 2y agoWe know which side you're cheering for. If every response to what you say is considered an "escalation", then that's your mindset, I suppose.
- ossobuco 2y agoIt's ad hominem time, meaning you have no actual arguments. We can consider the discussion resolved.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- aguaviva 2y agoActually the ad hominem resides in your weird, baiting language ("See how you're just escalating ..."). For which you were provided some helpful feedback.
- ossobuco 2y agoThat's not "ad hominem", it's noting how once your argument has been invalidated, you raise a new argument incompatible with the previous one. I'm not attacking your person based on the hypotetical side you are with; I'm criticising your rhetoric, which is clearly not ad hominem. Once again, as I see you're clearly out of arguments I consider this discussion resolved.
- aguaviva 2y agoIt's noting how once your argument has been invalidated, you raise a new argument incompatible with the previous one. Well I don't see it that way, and it seems you're reading a dynamic into the situation that just isn't there. But we agree in any case that the discussion has been dead for several iterations now.