3 ms·
You don't need to sync folders for this to work, though. When you search your data you still leave all of it "in the cloud", you just download a few relevant bi
by repsilat 14y ago
You don't need to sync folders for this to work, though. When you search your data you still leave all of it "in the cloud", you just download a few relevant bits of the index database.
As far as the user is concerned this provides efficient full-text search without heavy bandwidth or storage requirements and without giving the storage provider access to any plaintext. Maybe this is still a "local" solution by your definition, but who cares? How does it fall short of an "online" one?
- ricardobeat 14y agoIt falls short simply by not being online and requiring an app. Though it might be possible to do the decryption in javascript, I hadn't thought of that.
- repsilat 14y agoTo each their own. For anything I'd want to encrypt I wouldn't trust a closed app or a web interface. It's just too easy for them to get private data across the wire. If I'm blindly running the Javascript they send me I might as well give them the key and be done with it. My "best case" solution is a dumb protocol, a FUSE mount and maybe a local webserver for sharing, configuration and metadata. I don't really understand wanting to access files through anything but a filesystem (regardless of where they're actually stored), but I can accept that some people might.