Of course nobody believes them. Companies have explicitly pushed for the current state of affairs where legal entities can only be held to legally binding state

Of course nobody believes them. Companies have explicitly pushed for the current state of affairs where legal entities can only be held to legally binding statements; everything else is fair game. If that is the standard you want, then any statement that is not legally binding is, on its face, deceptive bullshit. If you want to quibble that, "technically speaking your honor, there exists a contrived interpretation in the worst-of-all universes where what I said is not technically false", then any statement that does not precisely encompass the stated behavior is still deceptive bullshit. If they want to be believed, then they need to make irrevocable, legally binding statements that expressly and broadly cover the common sense interpretation with strict liability, no-fault, liquidated damages clauses for failure to keep them honest. Anything less is legally not worth the paper it is written on.