3 ms·
I wonder how well this would work with laser microphones on a pane of glass. Can you infer keystrokes with near infrared laser? That is, can you identify the he
by killjoywashere 2y ago
I wonder how well this would work with laser microphones on a pane of glass. Can you infer keystrokes with near infrared laser? That is, can you identify the heatmap of keystroke events to infer which keyboard they're using, then replay the tape to identify the strings of characters being typed? Can you localize the turning of pages with UV?
- Salmonfisher11 2y agoDidn't Israeli students show that you can recover audio from the vibrations of bulb filament with a fast photo diode? I'd test that with a CCD line sensor plus a wide aperture lens and reading it out with 8kHz. Then you have 128 audio pixels that can cover an entire city.
- killjoywashere 2y agoLine of sight might be an issue there. I'm thinking more high-end clandestine eavesdropping. Fun fact: curtains are a pretty good defeat for laser microphones, but if the building is really old and made of solid stone, you can point at the rock instead!
- 0cf8612b2e1e 2y agoThe rock?! That’s incredible. I would have guessed it was too dense to pick up normal speaking volume. Then again, even the window glass vibration seems pretty magical to me.
- quantadev 2y agoThis beamforming effect only works well when each sensor is getting a dramatic enough "different angle" on the signal that each one can use phase shifting to cancel out other noise, but with a laser there's not really any noise to cancel out (i mean you're just monitoring a vibrational spot on a window), and you also don't have a far enough "different angle" to shine from, if you're monitoring from one spot. However having multiple lasers from multiple different locations might be able to create an improved signal if all signals are averaged, but it wouldn't really be due to the phase shifting that's used in beamforming.