20 ms·
> hey don't appear to do the obvious thing which is display the reconstructed "internal" board state. I've very confused by this, because they do. Then they ma
by IanCal 2y ago
> hey don't appear to do the obvious thing which is display the reconstructed "internal" board state.
I've very confused by this, because they do. Then they manipulate the internal board state and see what move it makes. That's the entire point of the paper. Figure 4 is literally displaying the reconstructed board state.
- foobarqux 2y agoI replied to a similar comment elsewhere: They aren't comparing the reconstructed board state with the actual board state which is the obvious thing to do.