3 ms·
the suggested solution seems to amount to 'functionally copyleft' for software distributions using the Rust name/trademark(s), and permissive licensing as norma
by throawayonthe 2y ago
the suggested solution seems to amount to 'functionally copyleft' for software distributions using the Rust name/trademark(s), and permissive licensing as normal in all other cases
sounds like a good solution to me, perhaps some concern about definition edge-cases
- db48x 2y agoYes, it does seem like the right solution. But honestly, why can’t these jokers read the terms of the existing license(s) and create a trademark license which doesn’t conflict with them?