3 ms·

> nobody has ever taken the time to write an RFC with supporting arguments. https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3243-packages-as-optional-namespaces.html https://

by Macha 2y ago

> nobody has ever taken the time to write an RFC with supporting arguments. https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3243-packages-as-optional-namespaces.html https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3243-packages-as-optional-n... https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3243 https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3243

littlestymaar 2y ago
Exactly, this isn't about “default namespace”, this is the other feature which I said had support (didn't know the RFC had been merged though, thanks for pointing that out). This isn't the kind of namespace people say they want to prevent squatting.