> The researchers were able to pinpoint exactly which species were present in hotspots where the virus spread. >The analysis doesn't prove the animals in those

> The researchers were able to pinpoint exactly which species were present in hotspots where the virus spread. >The analysis doesn't prove the animals in those areas were infected. However, the proximity of COVID-19 samples to where their DNA was located means it's a strong likelihood they were carriers, according to the study. Have they actually found these species carrying Covid-19? Otherwise, this evidence seems very, very weak to me. Perhaps someone can explain the implications and logic of this.