3 ms·
I don't know... It seems to be fairly entertaining, judging by the number of image album views and the number of comments here.
by antononcube 2y ago
I don't know... It seems to be fairly entertaining, judging by the number of image album views and the number of comments here.
- cr3ative 2y agoCausing annoyance by posting AI slop then having to justify it should not be mistaken for entertainment, it’s closer to trolling.
- andrewflnr 2y agoAnd I've gotten a lot of upvotes for explaining why it's annoying. Perhaps these are not the measures of truth you are looking for.
- antononcube 2y agoYes, that is a part of the measure I have in mind. Let me be more concrete. Terms: - P: Number of positive votes (of any comment) - N: Number of negative votes (of any comment) - V: Number of views of the image album - C: Number of comments in the thread Formula: w1 * P + w2 * N + w3 * V + w4 * C My weights: (w1, w2, w3, w4) = (1, 1, 1, 3) (Comments are harder to do than votes.)
- andrewflnr 2y agoThis is a formula that optimizes for trolling. If you insist on using it, expect more downvotes in the future.
- antononcube 2y agoThe formula is generic; my weights are for measuring engagement. (And, yes, I am very scared by the future downvotes.)