> Although, my AI-generation was a response to an interesting comment. Yes, that's why the comment it was in response to was not downvoted. But being interesti

> Although, my AI-generation was a response to an interesting comment. Yes, that's why the comment it was in response to was not downvoted. But being interesting and HN-appropriate isn't something responses automatically inherent from their parent comment. > You do not think readers are interested to see how the Chernobyl snow-globes look like?! Actual Chernobyl snow globes... maybe a link to that would be appropriate. AI hallucinations of what they might look like? Maybe if the context was a discussion of the capacities of different AI models and it was offered as a demonstration of the one that generated it, but not in the context it was presented, no.