4 ms·
I think few interpreted it quite the opposite of what I meant. What I meant was if all things are equal no one would want to be CEO of a falling company. Clearl
by YetAnotherNick 2y ago
I think few interpreted it quite the opposite of what I meant. What I meant was if all things are equal no one would want to be CEO of a falling company. Clearly even the current CEO is willing to work for $3.8M.
Think of your job and imagine the same job at completely dysfunctional company or company with terrible engineering. It's a reasonable expectation to demand more in the second company.