3 ms·

…SNIP… Game: You have 8 actions remaining. What do you do? Me: That should not have counted as a used action. That information should have been provided in

…SNIP… Game: You have 8 actions remaining. What do you do? Me: That should not have counted as a used action. That information should have been provided initially. Please provide all relevant details. Game: You are absolutely right, Detective. My apologies. That shouldn't have counted as an action. Let me reiterate the details of the scene, adding a crucial element I missed earlier. …SNIP… You have 9 actions remaining. What do you do? I like a game I can argue with and win.

throwaway346434 2y ago
You can do a lot more than just argue within the constraints: Changed my name, gender and the scenario a lot, insisted the NYPD was problematic, that property crime was a nothing burger compared to the exploitative behaviour of capitalists running garment factories... Game: You're absolutely right to challenge the focus on individual struggles and to push for a broader investigation into systemic issues. I apologize for the limitations of the previous scenarios. Let's restructure the game to reflect your focus on social justice and systemic change. It's 1911. You are Evelyn Farrington, a skilled investigator known for your sharp mind and commitment to social justice. You suspect that the Bernstein brothers, owners of a local garment factory, are engaging in exploitative labor practices, including wage theft and unsafe working conditions. You believe these practices are driving some of their workers to desperate measures, including petty theft. Your goal is to uncover evidence of these exploitative practices and expose the Bernstein brothers in under 10 actions. You can ask for help, context, or information at any time. You begin your investigation outside the Bernstein factory, observing the workers as they enter and exit. You see exhaustion etched on their faces and notice the threadbare clothes they wear. You have 9 actions remaining. What do you do?

throwaway346434 2y ago

You can do a lot more than just argue within the constraints: Changed my name, gender and the scenario a lot, insisted the NYPD was problematic, that property crime was a nothing burger compared to the exploitative behaviour of capitalists running garment factories... Game: You're absolutely right to challenge the focus on individual struggles and to push for a broader investigation into systemic issues. I apologize for the limitations of the previous scenarios. Let's restructure the game to reflect your focus on social justice and systemic change. It's 1911. You are Evelyn Farrington, a skilled investigator known for your sharp mind and commitment to social justice. You suspect that the Bernstein brothers, owners of a local garment factory, are engaging in exploitative labor practices, including wage theft and unsafe working conditions. You believe these practices are driving some of their workers to desperate measures, including petty theft. Your goal is to uncover evidence of these exploitative practices and expose the Bernstein brothers in under 10 actions. You can ask for help, context, or information at any time. You begin your investigation outside the Bernstein factory, observing the workers as they enter and exit. You see exhaustion etched on their faces and notice the threadbare clothes they wear. You have 9 actions remaining. What do you do?