One of the most absurdist takes I've seen even on the context of this topic, which brings out the worst in all of us. It's called sovereignty. A set of soverei

One of the most absurdist takes I've seen even on the context of this topic, which brings out the worst in all of us. It's called sovereignty. A set of sovereign nations should absolutely be able to decide that they want to form a court and arrest someone for war crimes if they set foot in their country. It's not like the court is sending agents to non-participating countries to arrest people. If the US govt decides they want to arrest e.g. Putin the second he sets foot on US soil, it's their right to do so. In fact it does so, just look at the FBI most wanted fugitives list, or Interpol red notices. Same goes here. The prosecuted are free not to set foot in participating countries.