> The analysis just provides data that more remote workers contribute nearly zero as compared to those in office. Sure, that's fine, and I'm just giving my opi

> The analysis just provides data that more remote workers contribute nearly zero as compared to those in office. Sure, that's fine, and I'm just giving my opinion on how that correlation isn't interesting unless there are more reasons to think it's a cause. The way it's presented seems to put the spotlight on remote work, whether intentional or not. I suspect there isn't as much of a gap if there was a clear delineation between those who like their job and those who don't. Maybe it would still be the same result, it would be more interesting either way.