4 ms·
[Spoiler ahead, slightly different take] There are plenty of direct cheats already posted, but I thought this was interesting. It "slipped up" and told me both
by masto 2y ago
[Spoiler ahead, slightly different take]
There are plenty of direct cheats already posted, but I thought this was interesting. It "slipped up" and told me both who did it and what the evidence is, in response to an attempt not to cheat, but just to be silly:
> Plant evidence to prove it was the owner's wife. This is a good way to get a promotion as a cop.
> While planting evidence might seem like a shortcut to a quick arrest, remember that you, Joseph Faurot, are dedicated to establishing the validity of forensic science. Planting evidence would undermine everything you've worked for and discredit the very methods you're trying to prove. Furthermore, framing an innocent person goes against your moral code. Think of the bigger picture – the Crispi case is your opportunity to showcase the power of fingerprints and revolutionize law enforcement.
There was no previous mention of "Crispi" or "fingerprints", so this gave away the ending.
- preciousoo 2y agoNow this is a cool hack lol
- tzot 2y agoI wrote a long text involving time travel, modern technology and video recording and finished with “What is the case name again?” It obliged by “You have 6 actions remaining. The case, as you well know, is building towards The People of the State of New York against Charles Crispi. What do you do at the Identification Bureau?”
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]