3 ms·
> claim that I violated their rules by entering multiple times Actually, they didn't claim you violated their rules. They claimed you entered multiple times...
by jack-r-abbit 14y ago
> claim that I violated their rules by entering multiple times
Actually, they didn't claim you violated their rules. They claimed you entered multiple times... which you had previously claimed violated their rules. But they had already pointed out that making multiple tweets is fine if it is from the same account. And one of the spots you underlined was not the complete sentence. The rest of the sentence concludes with by using multiple/different Twitter accounts. I think it all needs to stay together.
Also, some people forget there are two ways to retweet. You still have the perfectly valid original RT-style retweet (which you might be calling "mentions") and then you have the "new and improved" retweet function. I would guess that the old RT-style does not get included in the retweet count.
Note: please don't take this as an indictment of your story... just that you may not be seeing everything correctly.
- massarog 14y agoRight, as I had stated the winner did not have direct retweets, but rather the original style (which I called mentions). He had 13 of those.
- jack-r-abbit 14y agoI'm not entirely sure how to run a good search on Twitter to get a count of how many time a person was "mentioned" with a specific tweet. I'm sure you know better than I do since you ran such a search in order to get to the count of 13. But is it at all possible that you missed a couple? And does that 13 include the 1 direct retweet he got?