3 ms·
>> Remote work showing low contributions is a symptom of something else and I don't see this being addressed. That isn't the purpose of the analysis though. T
by abduhl 2y ago
>> Remote work showing low contributions is a symptom of something else and I don't see this being addressed.
That isn't the purpose of the analysis though. The analysis just provides data that more remote workers contribute nearly zero as compared to those in office.
It seems like you are trying to explain why remote workers underperforming is an organizational problem rather than something that can be put on the workers. Which might be true, but it seems kind of like the "it's always management's fault" argument.
- proc0 2y ago> The analysis just provides data that more remote workers contribute nearly zero as compared to those in office. Sure, that's fine, and I'm just giving my opinion on how that correlation isn't interesting unless there are more reasons to think it's a cause. The way it's presented seems to put the spotlight on remote work, whether intentional or not. I suspect there isn't as much of a gap if there was a clear delineation between those who like their job and those who don't. Maybe it would still be the same result, it would be more interesting either way.