The linked photo actually shows a really bad example. For the 'exit construction' to be valid, the footway must continue uninterrupted with the same surface. In

The linked photo actually shows a really bad example. For the 'exit construction' to be valid, the footway must continue uninterrupted with the same surface. In this example, different pavers where used, making the situation ambiguous. See the pictures in this article: https://www.anwb.nl/juridisch-advies/in-het-verkeer/verkeersregels/de-uitritconstructie https://www.anwb.nl/juridisch-advies/in-het-verkeer/verkeers... The first two examples are how it should be done. The third is similar to your link, and is ambiguous. I've had a cyclist curse me to hell and back for taking priority on one of those raised tables as a pedestrian because the paving didn't match the sidewalk. :)