3 ms·
I assume you meant GDB, not GCC, right? Seems like a deficiency in GDB (and maybe LLDB too), not in the kernel or x86.
by rep_lodsb 2y ago
I assume you meant GDB, not GCC, right?
Seems like a deficiency in GDB (and maybe LLDB too), not in the kernel or x86.
- amluto 2y agoI do mean GCC. Whoops. Deficiency or not, it breaks debugging. I’m willing to pay a cost of one byte per breakpoint as a workaround. And GDB has far more outrageous, if less-frequently hit, bugs in its architectural state handling. I’m not holding my breath for a fix.