5 ms·
I'd say intentionally destroying space assets etc should be considered an act of war (compare attacking another nation's ship in international waters), NK would
by Cthulhu_ 2y ago
I'd say intentionally destroying space assets etc should be considered an act of war (compare attacking another nation's ship in international waters), NK wouldn't have a chance and they could be put into space lockdown where any launches are intercepted.
- PittleyDunkin 2y agoGood luck dragging people into war over space trash that doesn't even benefit most peoples' lives in any material sense.
- lxgr 2y agoAre you sure that you have never looked at a weather forecast (or received a severe weather warning), crossed an ocean in an airplane, used GPS (or another satellite-based navigation system, or eaten food farmed using precision automated equipment that does), which are just the first things coming to mind that would be much harder without satellites?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- PittleyDunkin 2y agoDo you really think people will want to go to war to protect America's hegemony of gps?
- lxgr 2y agoI believe the US would almost certainly go to war if there were an intentional attack on GPS.
- PittleyDunkin 2y agoThe us goes to war if someone sneezes.
- mapt 2y agoIt is even worse than the analogy, because every bit of mass from that sunken ship becomes drifting naval mines.