>Point 1: "Economic self-interest for the working class includes both robust economic growth and a robust social safety net." >No point reading any further. Th

>Point 1: "Economic self-interest for the working class includes both robust economic growth and a robust social safety net." >No point reading any further. The author is a cancer advocate. So weak economic growth and letting people starve on the street is healthy? Or am I missing something? Edit: Added the important bit.