53 ms·
Good to know! I've seen the pattern of "int3; nop" before, but I've never seen the explanation for why. I'd always assumed it involved the desire to be able to
by JoshTriplett 2y ago
Good to know! I've seen the pattern of "int3; nop" before, but I've never seen the explanation for why. I'd always assumed it involved the desire to be able to live-patch a different instruction over it.
In Rust, we're using the `llvm.debugtrap` intrinsic. Does that DTRT?