3 ms·
It's for Indirect grammar is comparatively weak. It isn't "for consuming", it "consumes". consuming content No one "consumes content". They read, listen, wat
by ynniv 14y ago
It's for
Indirect grammar is comparatively weak. It isn't "for consuming", it "consumes".
consuming content
No one "consumes content". They read, listen, watch, and play.
relaxed
A good writer conveys by action, not by description. If you say that a joke is funny, it is not funny.
portable
He wouldn't need to say this while holding the device in his hand. And he further conveyed this by describing the product's battery life.
So to conclude, Jobs would have said (and may have, I don't remember):
d) Here's a book (thumb, thumb), and here's a movie (play). Isn't that great?
Try saying that for your product.