Much of the piece leans on the right's habit of "refuting" leftist academia by merely repeating its summed-up headline form in a sneering voice, without offerin

Much of the piece leans on the right's habit of "refuting" leftist academia by merely repeating its summed-up headline form in a sneering voice, without offering a real counterargument. This is not to say that I don't think there should be a rebuttal of any social sciencey claim, but that it should - and can - be done socratically. it's like any topic you think is simple until you research even a bit of it and go 'oh'