3 ms·
Damaging infrastructure is already a severe escalation. Should not have done that.
by Tade0 2y ago
Damaging infrastructure is already a severe escalation. Should not have done that.
- tossandthrow 2y ago[flagged]
- tallanvor 2y agoNuclear war is not a realistic concern, luckily. If it was, it would have happened after the first "red line" Russia claimed the west had crossed.
- tokai 2y agoOn the contrary, chilling would endanger everyone living the in the free world even further.
- Tade0 2y agoNot American - I'm Polish. I've got friends who got drafted already (if only for training) so it's entirely possible I'll join them eventually. My take is that Russia's plan is to continue sabotaging and a weak (or lack of) response to that only emboldens them. Also nuclear war with what? Their recent Satan II ICBM test demonstrated that they don't necessarily have the technical chops to launch anything sufficiently capable and it must have come as a surprise to them as well.
- p2detar 2y agoWe were chill since 2014 if not earlier. It brought nothing but pain both to Ukrainians and to us in the West. It doesn’t work.
- meindnoch 2y agoIt's high time for the West to man up and solve the Russian problem once and for all.